0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Anyone know a good forula to work out the best size intercooler to suit a particular engine size and Turbo size??
Quote from: GAS455 link=topic=3038.msg23981#msg23981Anyone know a good forula to work out the best size intercooler to suit a particular engine size and Turbo size??There is this site CLICK MEAnd I also found this......From: A GM High-Tech Performance Magazine ArticleThermal EfficiencyTo calculate an intercooler's thermal efficiency, you take the temperature in from the turbo minus the temp out of the intercooler, divided by the temp in from the turbo minus the ambient (or outside) temperature. Take that number, multiply it by 100, and you have the cooler's thermal efficiency. Here is the formula:Temp In-Temp Out------------------------ X 100 = Thermal EfficiencyTemp In-Temp AmbientOur stock, 157,000-mile, heat-cycled Garrett intercooler was tested in 69.3-degree-ambient temps. The air entering the intercooler from the turbo was at 267.4 degrees, and was cooled by the intercooler to 150.3 degrees.267.4 - 150.3 = 117.1----------------------------- X 100 = 59% Efficiency267.4 - 69.3 = 198.1Fifty-nine percent thermal efficiency is not good in anybody's book.MPE's enormous super stock-location intercooler fared much better. During testing, the ambient air was at 80.7 degrees. From a 269.5-degree intercooler inlet temp, the Mease unit cooled the charge air to a chilly-by-comparison 102.8 degrees.269.5 - 102.8 = 166.7---------------------------- X 100 = 88% Efficiency269.5 - 80.7 = 188.8Eighty-eight percent--29 percent better than the stocker. Numbers like that justify the 900-horse core rating that MPE gives this cooler!Pressure EfficiencyFinding pressure efficiency is easy: simply divide the pressure on the outlet side of the intercooler from the pressure on the inlet side. Pressure Out------------------- X 100 = Pressure EfficiencyPressure InUnfortunately, the scale that read pressure differences on the SuperFlow was 0 to 100psi, which meant that the recorded pressures weren't as precise as we would have needed to accurately test both intercoolers.However, let me share my findings: during dyno testing, I was running 24 pounds of boost. When I removed the stock cooler and installed the MPE unit, I had to turn the boost rod out (or down) five full turns to get back to 24 pounds. Just installing the new intercooler would have bumped the boost from 24 to 29psi, which indicates a much lower pressure drop through the MPE core.I've heard that a heat-cycled stock turbo Buick intercooler loses between 3-5psi through the core during high-boost operation. So let's use that worst-case-scenario 5psi drop in this formula, while running a hypothetical 24psi of boost:24psi Out-------------- X 100 = 82% Efficient29psi InThe turbo has to push much more air to make up for that pressure loss, and more boost equals more heat. In this case, the stock intercooler would only be 82 percent efficient.We don't know what the exact pressure drop is in the MPE stock-location intercooler, but let's draw on past aftermarket intercooler research and assume that it is exactly 1psi. So, at 24psi boost:24psi Out------------- X 100 = 96% Efficient25psi InThe turbocharger doesn't have to work as hard with a 96 percent pressure efficiency, which means that cooler air will be entering the intercooler. The way the MPE intercooler performed for us so well, our guesstimate of 1psi pressure loss could be excessive!
Phone 02 9829 5072
Phone 0438 658 458
Phone 0432 136 333